Comparison

Shaka vs. the other ways to keep kids safe online

We make one of the tools on this page, so we have an obvious bias. We have tried to write it the way we would want a competitor to write it: what each approach is genuinely good at, and where ours is the wrong choice.

The short version. These tools are not really competitors; they cover different layers. Device controls like Screen Time and Family Link handle when and how much. DNS filtering handles the whole network, bluntly. Monitoring apps handle messages and social media. Shaka Surf handles what happens inside the browser. Most families want two or three of these, not one. If you can only add one thing and your worry is what your kid runs into on the web, add a browser-level filter. If your worry is who is talking to them, a monitoring app covers ground Shaka does not.

The five approaches, side by side

Comparison of Apple Screen Time, Google Family Link, DNS filtering, monitoring apps and Shaka Surf across what they control, visibility, and cost.
ApproachWhat it is good atWhere it falls shortBest for
Apple Screen Time Time limits, downtime, app restrictions, purchase approval. Built into iOS, free, nothing to install. Its web content filter is blunt: it over-blocks ordinary pages and still misses others, and it shows you nothing about what your kid actually saw. Every iOS family, as the baseline layer.
Google Family Link The same baseline on Android and Chromebooks: app approval, screen time, location, account supervision. Free. Web filtering leans on SafeSearch and Chrome settings rather than reading pages. Supervision loosens significantly once a teen turns 13. Every Android family, as the baseline layer.
DNS filtering
(router or device-level)
Covers every device on the network at once, including consoles and smart TVs. Cheap or free. Stops applying the moment a device leaves the house wifi. Works on whole domains, so it cannot tell a safe page from an unsafe one on the same site. Households wanting one broad net across many devices.
Monitoring apps
(Bark, Qustodio and similar)
Reach into texts, email and social accounts and alert you to signals like bullying, self-harm or predatory contact. This is real ground no browser can cover. Coverage varies by platform and can break when apps change. The covert varieties tend to fail hard the day a kid discovers them. Worries centred on who is contacting your kid and what they are saying.
Shaka Surf + Shaka Safe The browser itself, built for kids. Four age levels, page-by-page reading as each page loads, a reason on every block and a button to ask you about it, and a timeline your kid sees too. It is a browser. It does not cover games, messaging apps, other apps, or a device you do not manage. iOS first, and not yet released. Worries centred on what your kid runs into on the web, and on older kids who resent being policed.

Last reviewed September 2026. Competitor features change; check the current details with each vendor before deciding.

Shaka vs. Apple Screen Time

These are not alternatives, and we would rather you ran both. Screen Time is the better tool for every question that ends in how long or which app, and it is free and already on the device. Use it.

The gap it leaves is inside the browser. Screen Time’s “Limit Adult Websites” is a single switch over Safari with no middle setting, no reason given to the kid when something is blocked, no way for them to ask you about it, and no record you can look at afterwards. A ten-year-old and a sixteen-year-old get the same filter. That is the part Shaka Surf replaces: four age levels instead of one switch, a reason on every block, an ask button, and a timeline you can both see.

Choose Screen Time alone if your worry is time and apps, or your kid is young enough that they only use a tablet you hand them. Add Shaka Surf if your kid browses the web on their own and you want to see it and shape it by age.

Shaka vs. Google Family Link

Same story, different platform. Family Link is the right baseline for Android and Chromebooks and we would not try to replace it. Two things are worth knowing: its web filtering mostly comes down to SafeSearch plus Chrome’s own site settings rather than any reading of the page, and its supervision powers change considerably when a supervised child turns 13.

One honest limitation on our side: Shaka Surf is launching on iOS first. If your family is on Android today, Family Link plus a DNS filter is the sensible setup, and we are not yet an option for you.

Shaka vs. monitoring apps like Bark or Qustodio

This is the comparison where we most often say “buy the other thing,” or at least “buy both.” Monitoring apps look at texts, email and social accounts and raise an alert when something in the language suggests bullying, self-harm, or an adult grooming a child. Shaka Surf cannot see any of that. It is a browser. If the thing keeping you up at night is who is in your kid’s DMs, a monitoring service addresses it and we do not.

Where we differ is in posture. Most monitoring is built for the parent to look at without the kid thinking about it much. We think that trade goes bad around age twelve: kids work out that they are being watched, and the response is almost never to behave differently where you can see. It is to move somewhere you cannot. So Shaka is deliberately built the other way. Your kid sees the same timeline you do, the first screen they open spells out what you can see, and there is no hidden mode and no silent tightening. We lose some visibility by that choice. We think we get back a kid who still browses in front of you at fifteen.

If you use a monitoring app, our one suggestion is to tell your kid it is there and what it looks at. Visible monitoring holds up over years. Secret monitoring tends to buy months.

Shaka vs. DNS filtering

DNS filtering is genuinely good value: one setting covers every device in the house, including the ones with no parental controls at all. Keep it if you have it.

Two limits. It works at the level of the whole domain, so it can block a site but cannot tell the difference between a harmless page and a harmful one on a site that hosts both, which describes most large platforms. And it applies to your network, so it stops the moment your kid is on cellular data or at a friend’s house. Shaka Surf’s filtering rides inside the browser app, so it travels with the device, and Wave Watch™ reads the actual page rather than the domain name.

Shaka vs. a kids’ walled-garden app

Curated kid apps, the ones with a fixed library of approved videos and games, are excellent for preschoolers and run out of road fast. Somewhere around eight or nine, a kid needs to look things up for school, and being handed a toy version of the internet starts to feel like a message about how much you trust them.

Shaka Surf starts in roughly the same place, an allow list with no search for the youngest level, and then keeps going: search with safe search forced on, then the open web behind a filter, then open water with a light touch. Same app, four age levels, so you are not migrating your kid to a new browser the year they outgrow the garden.

When Shaka is the wrong choice

Worth saying plainly.

What we would actually tell a friend

Turn on the free device controls that came with the phone, because they cost nothing and cover the hours. Put a real filter on the browser your kid uses, because that is where the accidents happen. Add a monitoring service if messaging is your specific worry. Keep the devices out of bedrooms overnight, which is worth more than any of the software. And tell your kid what you can see, because that is the layer that still works when they are at someone else’s house.

We built the browser part. The rest of it we would recommend to you whether or not you ever use ours.

Questions parents ask

Do I need Shaka if I already use Screen Time?

Only if your worry is the web itself. Screen Time handles time limits, app access and purchases well, and Shaka does not replace any of that. What Screen Time does not do is filter by age level, tell your kid why a page was blocked, let them ask you about it, or show you what they actually visited. If those gaps matter to you, add Shaka Surf and keep Screen Time. If they do not, Screen Time alone is a reasonable setup.

Is Shaka a replacement for Bark or Qustodio?

No. Those services monitor texts, email and social accounts and alert you to signals like bullying or predatory contact. Shaka Surf is a browser and cannot see any of that. They cover different risks, and plenty of families would sensibly run both. If you can only pick one, pick based on your actual worry: what your kid runs into on the web, or who is talking to them.

Which is better for a teenager?

For teenagers we would argue against heavy blocking of any kind, ours included. A fifteen-year-old who feels policed will browse on a friend’s phone, where you have no view and no way to help. Shaka’s oldest age level is built for this: the worst categories stay closed, most of the web is open, and your teen knows exactly what you can see. Whatever tool you choose, transparency matters more at this age than restriction does.

Can I use Shaka alongside my existing parental controls?

Yes, and that is the intended setup. Shaka Surf is a browser app, so it sits under whatever device controls you already run. Keep your time limits, your app approvals and your DNS filter. Shaka Surf becomes the browser your kid uses, and with Screen Time access it can remove or block the other browsers so their browsing goes through it.

Is a free option good enough?

For a lot of families, especially with younger kids on a shared tablet, the free device controls plus a free DNS filter genuinely are enough. We would rather you started there than bought something you did not need. The case for adding a paid layer gets stronger when a kid has their own device, browses unsupervised, and is old enough that a blunt on/off filter creates more arguments than it prevents.

Does Shaka sell or share my family’s data?

No. There are intentionally no third-party advertising or analytics tools in the kid app. Shaka is family owned and self-funded, so there is no engagement target to hit and no investor asking for time-on-device numbers. Our incentive is that the product is worth paying for, not that your kid is online longer.

Shaka helps families build relationships and have healthy conversations. Not monitor each other.

If the browser is the gap, we built for it

Join the waitlist and you’ll get one email the day Shaka Surf lands on the App Store, and a short note now and then before that. No pressure if one of the others on this page fits you better.

No spam · Unsubscribe any time · Family owned and self-funded